Haiden Deegan Responds to Ricky Carmichael’s Comments on Eli Tomac’s Skills and Technology in Motocross

In a recent podcast, legendary motocross racer Ricky Carmichael, often referred to as the “GOAT” (Greatest of All Time), discussed the evolving skill sets and technological advancements in the sport of motocross. Specifically, he commented on Eli Tomac’s impressive performance, suggesting that Tomac’s success is as much a result of the advancements in bike technology as it is his own skill.

Ricky Carmichael, with seven AMA Motocross Championships and numerous SuperMotocross (SMX) victories under his belt, is no stranger to debates about the relationship between rider talent and the bikes they ride. His comments sparked some discussion in the motocross community, with many agreeing that modern bikes offer tremendous advantages compared to past decades. However, it was Haiden Deegan, the rising star of motocross and son of motocross icon Brian Deegan, who recently weighed in on this debate with a thought-provoking response.

Haiden Deegan, known for his own impressive career trajectory and candid opinions, took to social media to share his thoughts on Carmichael’s remarks. Deegan acknowledged Carmichael’s unparalleled accomplishments in the sport, calling him the “GOAT” for his seven AMA Motocross titles, among other achievements. However, Haiden Deegan made an important distinction in his argument.

“No doubt Ricky Carmichael is the GOAT of motocross with seven AMA MX and other SMX wins,” Deegan began. “But he had better bikes than the 1980s, and the 80s greats had better bikes than the 70s. So, modern bikes on Tomac now doesn’t mean the technology is the only reason he’s doing what he’s doing.”

Deegan’s comment underscores a key point in the ongoing discussion surrounding the role of technology in motocross. While the current generation of bikes—like those ridden by Eli Tomac—are undoubtedly equipped with cutting-edge features that enhance performance, Deegan suggests that each era’s advancements in bike technology have always played a crucial role in helping riders push the limits of the sport.

Deegan’s perspective places emphasis on the fact that motocross legends from the past, like those in the ’70s and ’80s, also had access to more advanced technology in their time. However, it was their sheer skill and grit that allowed them to achieve greatness, much as Tomac does today with modern machinery. Haiden suggests that no matter how much technology progresses, the heart of motocross will always be the rider’s talent and determination.

In conclusion, Haiden Deegan’s response highlights a complex yet essential part of the motocross conversation—technology certainly influences the sport, but rider skill will always remain the defining factor. Both technology and talent must coexist to create true champions, and Eli Tomac’s legacy will likely continue to reflect this delicate balance.